Falsifiability of the Big Bang Theory Essay

In wholeness of Karl Raimund Poppers works, he discussed the demarcation that differentiate the sciences from the non-sciences or those that ar only subjects of faith and pseudo-sciences. Popper believes that sciences are falsifiable. If something can be falsified it can be considered as a science. He argued that unlike the work of Einstein which is capable of self-contradictory with attainable, or conceivable, observations, the works of Freud, Marx and Adler proves every event as compatible to their theories which in Poppers argument was not scientific.No matter what the situation is, Freud, Marx and Adler would rationalize it in terms of their guess which is somehow a subjective counsel of explaining or looking into things. For instance, a selfish capitalist could be examine as someone who was fixated to a certain Freudian psychosexual arrange or was suffering from Adlers concept of inferiority. Marx would analyze the man from a class-struggle perspective.Popper believes that although there are evidences and evident facts that could prove the collar theories through experimentation, these experiments are not falsifiable and are therefore merely based on faith and subjective judgments. In the case of the Big chill theory, it argues that the cosmos is expanding. The theory stated that the universe had started from an initial bang or magnification of a very dense material.The impact of the explosion, according to the theory, is still observable today. Evidences shows that the space was expanding as quasars and galaxies are perceived to shift in their intelligible wavelengths. Hubble assumed, with respect to his observations, that either the universe is moving away from a common snapping turtle were an explosion had originated or that the universe was in constant expansion. Unlike the three theories mentioned above, the Big Bang theory left space for debate and possible changes.The three previous theories would always hold true in old and future c ircumstances and would always have an explanation about the phenomena that they are concerned with (personality or human nature). On the other hand, the Big Bang theory may be false whenever a new breakthrough proves that a Big Bang had not occurred. Big Bang theory passed the falsifiable criterion set by Popper. References Balashov, Y. & Rosenberg, (2002). A. Philosophy of Science contemporaneous Readings. Routledge. Pages 294-300. Edwards, R. E. (2001). What Caused the Big Bang? New York Rodopi B. V.